<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Women in Labor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog</link>
	<description>Amy B. Royal, Esq. and Kimberly A. Klimczuk, Esq. discuss developments in labor and employment law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:20:58 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Massachusetts Senate passes bill requiring employers to give time off to victims of domestic violence by Matt Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=272&#038;cpage=1#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 20:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=272#comment-547</guid>
		<description>I am glad to see that this issue has been brought to light.  For far too long abuse victims have felt that they can get no compassionate support from work and are often ashamed of their situation.  Hopefully the bill will pass and Corporations and Companies will follow up on this disconcerning matter helping more than the law requires, with understanding and patience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad to see that this issue has been brought to light.  For far too long abuse victims have felt that they can get no compassionate support from work and are often ashamed of their situation.  Hopefully the bill will pass and Corporations and Companies will follow up on this disconcerning matter helping more than the law requires, with understanding and patience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Legislature Considers Bill Allowing Employees To Bypass CHRO by henry jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=211&#038;cpage=1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>henry jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=211#comment-122</guid>
		<description>navigating through CHRO is a complete waste of time. legislation that would eliminate this costly, time consuming and fruitless impediment to redress for violated employess would be a welcome change and most overdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>navigating through CHRO is a complete waste of time. legislation that would eliminate this costly, time consuming and fruitless impediment to redress for violated employess would be a welcome change and most overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EEOC issues proposed rule on age discrimination defense by RIAA Announces New Campus Lawsuit Strategy &#124; LawsuitBlog.info</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=216&#038;cpage=1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>RIAA Announces New Campus Lawsuit Strategy &#124; LawsuitBlog.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=216#comment-118</guid>
		<description>[...] EEOC issues proposed rule on age discrimination defense « Women in &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] EEOC issues proposed rule on age discrimination defense « Women in &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Legislature Considers Bill Allowing Employees To Bypass CHRO by Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=211&#038;cpage=1#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=211#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Additionally, it is unclear whether an employee who first filed at the CHRO would even need to wait over 210 days to obtain a release of jurisdiction to file in court.  It would seem that the waiting period would no longer apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additionally, it is unclear whether an employee who first filed at the CHRO would even need to wait over 210 days to obtain a release of jurisdiction to file in court.  It would seem that the waiting period would no longer apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Legislature Considers Bill Allowing Employees To Bypass CHRO by Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=211&#038;cpage=1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=211#comment-107</guid>
		<description>If enacted as written, the legislation is likely to lead to confusion on the part of employees on where to file and what limitations period applies.  For instance, the bill appears to retain the 180 day limitations period for complaints filed at the CHRO yet significantly expands the limitations period to 2 years for employees who choose to file in court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If enacted as written, the legislation is likely to lead to confusion on the part of employees on where to file and what limitations period applies.  For instance, the bill appears to retain the 180 day limitations period for complaints filed at the CHRO yet significantly expands the limitations period to 2 years for employees who choose to file in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connecticut Legislature Considers Bill Allowing Employees To Bypass CHRO by Jim O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=211&#038;cpage=1#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=211#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not familiar with your organization but would be interested in your input on this matter.

Thanks,

Jim O&#039;Neill
Legislative Liaison &amp; Media Spokesman
Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities
21 Grand Street
Hartford, CT 06106
(o) 860-241-4866
(c) 860-539-7493
james.j.oneill@ct.gov</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with your organization but would be interested in your input on this matter.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Jim O&#8217;Neill<br />
Legislative Liaison &amp; Media Spokesman<br />
Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities<br />
21 Grand Street<br />
Hartford, CT 06106<br />
(o) 860-241-4866<br />
(c) 860-539-7493<br />
<a href="mailto:james.j.oneill@ct.gov">james.j.oneill@ct.gov</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Federal Legislation Designed to Ease the Standard in Proving Age Cases by Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=49#comment-32</guid>
		<description>On November 16, the bill went into the Subcommittee on Health and Labor and, to date, remains there.  When we hear of any developments, we will do a blog update about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On November 16, the bill went into the Subcommittee on Health and Labor and, to date, remains there.  When we hear of any developments, we will do a blog update about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Did it Again: Congress Introduces Another Bill That Would Mandate Paid Sick Leave for &#8220;Contagious Illnesses&#8221; by forex robot</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>forex robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=139#comment-31</guid>
		<description>nice post. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Did it Again: Congress Introduces Another Bill That Would Mandate Paid Sick Leave for &#8220;Contagious Illnesses&#8221; by They Did it Again: Congress Introduces Another Bill That Would Mandate Paid Sick Leave for &#34;Contagious Illnesses&#34; &#124; H1N1INFLUENZAVIRUS.US</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=139&#038;cpage=1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>They Did it Again: Congress Introduces Another Bill That Would Mandate Paid Sick Leave for &#34;Contagious Illnesses&#34; &#124; H1N1INFLUENZAVIRUS.US</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=139#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...] as including influenza-like illnesses such as the 2009 H1N1 virus&#8230;.     Read the original: They Did it Again: Congress Introduces Another Bill That Would Mandate Paid Sick Leave for &quot;Con...   Posted in H1N1 Influenza Virus. Tags: illnesses-such, including-influenza-like, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as including influenza-like illnesses such as the 2009 H1N1 virus&#8230;.     Read the original: They Did it Again: Congress Introduces Another Bill That Would Mandate Paid Sick Leave for &quot;Con&#8230;   Posted in H1N1 Influenza Virus. Tags: illnesses-such, including-influenza-like, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Federal Legislation Designed to Ease the Standard in Proving Age Cases by april cullingford</title>
		<link>http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=49&#038;cpage=1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>april cullingford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rkesq.com/blog/?p=49#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I would like to find out where this legislation stands for now. Will it be acted upon in the near future. I just saw an article referencing this in the Wall Street Journal.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to find out where this legislation stands for now. Will it be acted upon in the near future. I just saw an article referencing this in the Wall Street Journal.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
