Posts Tagged ‘Brian Hayes’

NLRB Responds to Supreme Court’s Decision Voiding Nearly 600 of its Cases

Friday, July 2nd, 2010

As we previously reported on our blog, on June 17, the United States Supreme Court, in New Process Steel v. NLRB, held that the National Labor Relations Board did not have the authority to render decisions from January 2008 to March 2010 when there were only two members sitting on the board. This ruling voided nearly 600 cases decided during the twenty-seven month period.

In response to the Supreme Court’s ruling, the NLRB is seeking to have the cases remanded to them for further consideration. According to the NLRB in a press release issued today, “[e]ach of the remanded cases will be considered by a three-member panel of the Board which will include Chairman [Wilma] Liebman and Board Member [Peter] Schaumber. Consistent with Board practice, the two other Board members not on the panel will have the opportunity to participate in the case if they so desire.”

With the confirmation of Brian Hayes on June 22, the board reached its full five members. The NLRB had not had full membership since December 2007 and, for over twenty-seven months up until this April, it operated with only two members.

Senate Unanimously Confirms Hayes and Pearce to NLRB

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Today, the United States Senate unanimously confirmed Mark Pearce and Brian Hayes to the National Labor Relations Board. President Obama had nominated both of them to the Board nearly one year ago, in July 2009.

As we reported on our blog in March, President Obama had appointed Pearce, along with highly controversial pro-union attorney, Craig Becker, using what is known as a recess appointment, which is an appointment made while Congress is not in session and does not require Congress’ assent. Because these appointments were made during a Congressional recess, the terms were set to expire rather quickly, ending in 2011. Now that the Senate has approved Pearce, his term will not expire until August 2013.

Hayes, a management-side labor attorney, will fill a term expiring in December 2012. With these two appointments, the NLRB will have its full five members. The NLRB has not had full membership since December 2007 and, for over twenty-seven months up until this April, it operated with only two members. Over that period of time, the two member board decided approximately 600 cases on which they could agree. As we reported on our blog last week, on June 17, the United States Supreme Court held that the two member board did not have the authority to issue any of these rulings.