Posts Tagged ‘workplace policies’

Summer attire can cause headaches for employers

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

Summertime is approaching, and some employers may find that as the heat creeps into the workplace, so do the sundresses, shorts, tank tops, and sandals.  Some employees wear clothes that seem to reveal more than they conceal, which can create problems in the workplace, not only because an employee’s casual attire may not reflect the level of professionalism an organization wants to portray, but also because, in extreme cases, attire that is inappropriate could form the basis for hostile work environment claims.  Many employers implement dress codes to help alleviate these issues.  However, implementing a dress code can bring its own set of problems.  If you have a dress code, or are thinking of implementing one, here are some things you should keep in mind:

  • Enforce the dress code policy consistently.  As with any policy, the failure to apply a dress code equally to all employees puts employers at risk for discrimination claims.
  • Put your policy in writing and make sure your policy is clear and specific.  It should be easy for employees to understand how they can abide by the dress code and easy for supervisors to know when a violation occurs.  A policy that is vague and allows for differences in interpretation may cause more problems than it solves.
  • Beware of possible conflicts with state or federal law.  For example, a policy that prohibits men from wearing ponytails or earrings while allowing women to do so could constitute discrimination based on sex or gender.
  • Banning headwear or facial hair could violate religious beliefs.  In many cases, you may have to accommodate these beliefs.

Clearly the workplace of today differs from the workplace of 30 years ago.  Many employers have moved towards a more casual attitude with respect to workplace attire.  However, there can be a fine line between casual and inappropriate.  If you are experiencing problems with inappropriate attire in your workplace, you may want to create – or revamp – a dress code.  To avoid potential conflicts with state or federal laws, be sure to consult with labor and employment counsel for guidance in drafting, revising or implementing a dress code.

Massachusetts Senate passes bill requiring employers to give time off to victims of domestic violence

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Last week the Massachusetts Senate approved a bill that would require employers of 50 or more employees to provide up to 15 days of leave in any 12-month period to an employee if the employee or family member of the employee, is a victim of domestic violence, stalking or sexual assault. “Family member” includes spouses, parents, step-parents, children, step-children, siblings, grandparents, and grandchildren; people “in a substantive dating or engagement relationship” who live together; people who have a child in common, even if they are unmarried or do not live together; and people in a guardianship relationship. The employee would be entitled to leave only if the leave is taken to address issues arising out of the domestic violence, stalking or sexual assault in order to seek or obtain a court order of protection, medical attention, counseling, victim services, legal assistance, secure housing, or to appear in court as a witness, attend child custody proceedings, consult with a district attorney or other law enforcement official, or other issues directly related to the domestic violence, stalking or sexual assault.

The bill passed by the Senate would allow employers to give the leave with or without pay, and employers could require employees to use up available sick time or vacation time before using the 15 days provided under the proposed law. Employers also could require employees to provide documentation demonstrating that the employee or a family member has been the victim of domestic violence, stalking or sexual assault. Employers covered by the proposed law would be required to notify employees of their right to take leave under the law.

The bill has now moved on to the House of Representatives. It hasn’t yet been scheduled for debate, but it is expected that the House will take action on the bill before the July recess. We will be sure to provide any updates as they occur.

Firing Over Facebook

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Facebook Pictures, Images and Photos

Issues surrounding social networking and the workplace have started to hit the national news. In fact, just last week, a former school teacher in Georgia sued the school district claiming she was forced to step down from her job after the school district received complaints about pictures she posted and comments she made on her Facebook profile. The photos, which were taken on a European vacation, showed the former teacher holding beer and wine. The teacher also posted expletives on her Facebook profile, which was apparently private. Such behavior was not well-received by the school and the school ultimately asked her to leave because of it.

As we previously blogged on November 11, in this day and age of constant Facebooking and tweeting, employers may want to consider monitoring what their employees are putting out there for public consumption. Indeed, their employees could be making derogatory comments about the company or their co-workers or discriminatory remarks about certain protected groups for the entire world to see. Or, they might be posting embarassing pictures, making inappropriate remarks or otherwise acting in ways that reflect poorly on the company. Because of the potential for such issues, employers need to think about developing policies addressing social networking.

As previously noted, such policies should address whether employees are permitted to access any social networking websites in the workplace. It should also address whether employees are permitted to access such sites outside of the workplace. In addition, a social networking policy should address whether supervisors are permitted to become online friends with subordinates or peers on Facebook and Myspace and whether they can follow one another on Twitter. Such a policy should also restrict the transmission of confidential customer or other company information, including trade secrets or proprietary information and restrict the use of the company logo or service mark on these sites. Further, the policy should restrict non-exempt workers from using social networking sites to benefit the company as such time, if not compensated, may violate wage/hour laws. The policy should also impose disciplinary measures for any violations.

To Ban or Not To Ban: The Question of Whether Employers Should Prohibit Employees from Social Networking Inside and Outside of Work

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

Dilbert.com

I do it. You do it. It seems like most everyone is doing it. Aided by laptops, blackberries and iPhones, social networking is taking place at almost any time and almost everywhere. Indeed, Facebook and Twitter could be two of the most popular mediums of communication nowadays and are being used by individuals both inside and outside of the workplace. Even if you’re not tweeting yet, many of your employees are and, because of that, you need to know how your company should address this phenomenon.

In the business world, employees use of social networking websites carry with it both pluses and minuses for the company. On the plus side, social networking can be a great (and cheap) marketing tool for your company. On the minus side, social networking could expose the company to a variety of potential legal claims.

Over the last ten years or so, employers have grown to recognize the need for implementing strong electronic communication policies to address how employees can and cannot use the company computer system. But many employers have not yet recognized the need for implementing policies addressing the use of social networking websites despite the large number of people utilizing them. Some employers failure to have such a policy could be a sign that they are lagging behind the times. Some may just be hesitant about limiting employee speech, especially if it is occurring outside of the workplace, and others may not know where to begin. Whatever the reason may be, if your business does not have a policy addressing social networking, it could spell all kinds of trouble for you down the road. Indeed, employees may post embarrassing or potentially harassing pictures on their social networking page. Or, they may post derogatory comments about the company or their co-workers or about someone’s race, religion, sexual orientation, etc. Such comments may then make their way back into the workplace and cause discord. Additionally, employees may disclose information about your company that is confidential or detrimental.

Because social networking is here to stay, at least for the foreseeable future, you need to have a policy addressing it. Firstly, such a policy should address whether employees are permitted to access any social networking websites in the workplace. Secondly, it should address whether employees are permitted to access them outside of the workplace. In fact, some employers, such as the United States Marines, have banned recruits from using any social networking sites both inside and outside the workplace.

In addition, a social networking policy should address whether supervisors are permitted to friend subordinates or peers are permitted to friend peers on Facebook and Myspace and whether they can follow one another on Twitter. Such a policy should also restrict the transmission of confidential customer or other company information, including trade secrets or proprietary information and restrict the use of the company logo or service mark on these sites. The policy should also restrict non-exempt workers from using social networking sites to benefit the company as such time, if not compensated, may violate wage/hour laws. Further, the policy should impose disciplinary measures for any violations.